Face it. First impressions last a long time, yet employee orientations can be pretty dull stuff. The goal is usually to get new hires up to speed on work rules and environment. Most companies try to do this as quickly as possible while trying not to bore, discourage, or overwhelm newcomers. But some experts think the goal should be more ambitious because the orientation period gives employers a unique opportunity to impress and engage.
A new i4cp survey, conducted in partnership with HR.com, shows that most organizations try to move swiftly through the new employee orientation (NEO) process. Of 597 respondents, fully 86% say their organizations have such orientations companywide. Nearly half of them (46%) say the process lasts a day or less, and another 26% say it lasts two to three days.
What do most organizations do during orientations? The top four activities, according to the i4cp survey, are telling new employees about benefits (86%), core values (83%), company history (82%) and mission/vision statements (78%). There’s also the semi-obligatory tour of the facility (cited by 72%) and a host of other possibilities, from communicating policies and procedures to teaching about safety and compliance issues.
There’s nothing wrong with any of this, of course. It’s a basic tenet of group dynamics that newcomers learn about the group’s values, history, and vision in order to become functioning members. New employees deserve thorough explanations of important policies on issues such as ethics, harassment, confidentiality, and other items that require their signatures. And, they need
to know the details of their benefits packages, partially to give them an appreciation of the value of their new affiliation and partially because there are often important decisions that must be made about those packages.
But these basics can feel like a “to do” list for employers and like a torrent of hard-to-assimilate information for new workers. To truly engage people in the NEO process, some companies try to establish more personal or emotional connections. The i4cp survey specifically asked respondents about what kind of “wow” factors companies use in the orientation process. It found that the
most commonly used “wow” factors include giving out company memorabilia such as pens, shirts, and binders (cited by 54% of respondents) and getting senior staff involved with the orientation (cited by 46%). Twelve percent of respondents said that there was no “wow” factor associated with orientation.
Judging from write-in survey responses, a lot of organizations also engage in the age-old tradition of breaking bread with new group members in order to make them feel welcome and to get to know them. There’s often a breakfast, lunch or both, and sometimes this includes a meal with the CEO or other senior leader. Some organizations even go out of their way to provide new
hires with favorite foods, gifts or other “pleasant surprises.” One survey respondent wrote, for example, “we find out what some of their favorite things are and we try to find them and give them on orientation.”
Other respondents seem more skeptical of special gifts or events. One wrote, “I think more important to folks is getting them the right info and getting them connected (literally and figuratively) so that they can be/feel productive.” Indeed, feeling connected and developing relationships can be an important part of orientation programs. Various respondents pointed to establishing mentoring relationships as part of the NEO process, and one participant alluded to a “new employee networking program” and a “new
employee mentor/buddy for [the] first six months.” Through such relationship-building, new recruits can gain deeper insights into the unique qualities of their new employers.
Some companies take orientation to another level. In a recent Harvard Business Review
article, Tamara J. Erickson, president of the Concours Institute, and Lynda Gratton, a professor of management practice at London Business School, suggest giving new hires a taste of the “signature experience” of their new organizations. “The experience,” they wrote, “is created by a bundle of everyday routines, or signature processes, which are tricky for competitors to imitate precisely because they have evolved in-house
and reflect the company’s heritage and the leadership team’s ethos.” By involving new employees in this way, employers aren’t just telling employees about the values and procedures of the organization, they’re giving employees a chance to experience them first hand.
Erickson and Gratton point to the example of Trilogy Software, which places new employees in what amounts to a three-month “extreme orientation period” during which they’re immersed in team-based innovation
projects that focus on anything from developing new products to coming up with whole new business models. After new employees emerge from this trial by
fire, the organization pores over their performance and provides exhaustive feedback to them.
This kind of intense orientation isn’t suitable for every company or every new recruit, but it gives new workers at Trilogy a good idea of what the organization does and the values it lives by. Assuming Trilogy has recruited the right kind of people, this sort of experience not only can energize and engage people but can give them the kind of knowledge and networks that make them much more productive over the long haul.
Such NEO programs blur the lines between orientation, onboarding, training, and development. Maybe that’s where the most important “wow” factors emerge in some organizations. Getting a t-shirt with the company logo on it is great, but it’s no substitute for being truly excited by an organizational culture and a career that fit the new recruit to a T.
For more information:
For complete survey results, please see the New Employee Orientation
Survey at www.hrinstitute.info
Documents referenced in this article include the following:
Erickson, Tamara J. and Lynda Gratton. “What It Means to Work Here.” Harvard Business Review
. Business Source Premier. March 2007.
i4cp. New Employee Orientation Program: Survey Results
. April 2007.